Federal Civil Rights Lawsuits and Civil Gideon: a Solutionto Disproportionate Police Force?

Andrew J. Mathern

Excerpted from: Andrew J. Mathern, Federal Civil Rights Lawsuits and Civil Gideon: a Solution to Disproportionate Police Force? , 15 Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 353 (Spring 2012) (Student Note) (199 Footnotes Omitted).

 

The U.S. legal system does not sufficiently deter the use of disproportionate force by police. Federal civil rights lawsuits have the potential to deter because they require police officers to justify their actions in a formal setting, but victims of police brutality underutilize this mechanism. To provide an effective enforcement mechanism, federal courts and Congress should provide for the appointment of counsel for indigent claimants to pursue section 1983 actions when police brutality occurs. In support of this proposition, this Part: (A) criticizes existing legal remedies for their failure to deter police brutality; (B) argues that appointed counsel is an implied in the Constitution under the authority of Gideon v. Wainwright and Douglas v. California; and (C) outlines a proposed amendment to 1983 that requires federal district courts to appoint counsel for indigent plaintiffs in certain circumstances.

To post comments, you need to register and login. To register, go to the Login module below.

You can browse the site without logging in. You need to log in to read more, to leave comments and to receive periodic updates. Your email will NEVER be shared with anyone.

Please Share!

On the Web Since 1995

Vernellia R. Randall
Professor of Law
The University of Dayton
School of Law
Dayton, OH 45469-2772
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Site Statistics

  • Unique Visits Today1318
  • Visits This Week6568
  • Visits Previous Week7264
  • Total Articles743
  • New Articles This Week0

 

Mini-Course:
   Race, Health Care and the Law  
 

 

 

Latest Articles