No MANDATORY Life Without Parole for Juvenile (Miller v Alabama)

The Court has determined that a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole for juvenile offenders violates the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishments. The decision, in a case out of Alabama, builds on two previous rulings from the court, which affirm that juveniles are developmentally different than their adult counterparts, for whom such sentences may not violate the 8th Amendment ban.

The court left open the possibility that individual judges could sentence juveniles to life without parole in individual cases of murder, but said state and federal laws cannot automatically impose such a sentence.

Dissenting, the court's four conservatives said nothing in the Constitution forbids laws requiring mandatory life in prison without parole for juveniles. Chief Justice John Roberts was joined in the main dissent by Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Alito also wrote separately and read his dissent aloud in the courtroom



To post comments, you need to register and login. To register, go to the Login module below.

You can browse the site without logging in. You need to log in to read more, to leave comments and to receive periodic updates. Your email will NEVER be shared with anyone.

Please Share!

On the Web Since 1995

Vernellia R. Randall
Professor of Law
The University of Dayton
School of Law
Dayton, OH 45469-2772
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Site Statistics

  • Unique Visits Today1072
  • Visits This Week6842
  • Visits Previous Week6932
  • Total Articles743
  • New Articles This Week0

 

Mini-Course:
   Race, Health Care and the Law  
 

 

 

Latest Articles