Papers Pleased Provision Uphelded (Arizona v. UniteStates)d

In a split decision, the Supreme Court upheld one part of a tough Arizona immigration law, but struck down other sections.  The Court upheld the part of the law requiring police  offficers when stopping someone to make efforts to verify the person’s immigration status with the federal government.  The court struck down the following provisions:

  • One making it a crime for an illegal immigrant to work or to seek work in Arizona;
  • One which authorized state and local officers to arrest people without a warrant if the officers have probable cause to believe a person is an illegal immigrant;
  • And one that made it a state requirement for immigrants to register with the federal government.

Joining Kennedy's majority opinion were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor.  Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito concurred in part and dissented in part.  Justice Elena Kagan, who served as Obama’s solicitor general, had recuse herself from the Arizona case.

 

 



To post comments, you need to register and login. To register, go to the Login module below.

You can browse the site without logging in. You need to log in to read more, to leave comments and to receive periodic updates. Your email will NEVER be shared with anyone.

Please Share!

On the Web Since 1995

Vernellia R. Randall
Professor of Law
The University of Dayton
School of Law
Dayton, OH 45469-2772
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Site Statistics

  • Unique Visits Today1245
  • Visits This Week6784
  • Visits Previous Week7390
  • Total Articles743
  • New Articles This Week0

 

Mini-Course:
   Race, Health Care and the Law  
 

 

 

Latest Articles