The Outdated "Blood" Test Used to Determine Indian Status in Federal Criminal Prosecution
- Parent Category: Defining Racial Groups
- Category: American Indian and Inuits
- Quintin Cushner and Jon M. Sands
- Hits: 645
Excerpted from: Quintin Cushner and Jon M. Sands, Blood Should Not Tell: The Outdated Blood Test Used to Determine Indian Status in Federal Criminal Prosecution, 59-APR Federal Lawyer 31 (April, 2012). (44 footnotes omitted)
Blood should no longer play a leading role in determining whether a person is an Indian for purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction. The blood test evokes racial language in our jurisprudence that is outdated and unnecessary in 2012. A better test would discard blood and focus entirely on whether the person is enrolled or eligible for enrollment in a federally recognized Indian tribe.
Perhaps it is because of the way that blood can serve both as a symbol of our shared humanity (If you prick us, do we not bleed?) and our differences (Just one drop of black blood makes a man colored.) that we find it troubling that, for over a century and a half, federal courts have employed a blood test to assess whether a person is an Indian or a non-Indian for the purpose of federal criminal jurisdiction. Currently, in detemining whether an individual is an Indian for this purpose, federal courts examine that person's degree of Indian blood relating to a federally recognized tribe and his or her tribal or governmental recognition as an Indian.
In this article, we trace the use of the blood test in determining Indian status from its origins to its current applications. Ultimately, we conclude that, as applied by federal courts, the use of a blood test as a factor that determines Indian status both harks back to antiquated views and risks violating the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Given these concerns, we believe that the use of the blood test for purposes of federal law should be relegated to the dustbin of history. Instead, tribal or governmental recognition of an individual as an Indian--only one prong of the two-pronged test that is currently used to determine a person's status as an Indian--is sufficient.
On the Web Since 1995
Vernellia R. Randall
Professor of Law
The University of Dayton
School of Law
Dayton, OH 45469-2772
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Site Statistics
- Unique Visits Today1344
- Visits This Week6548
- Visits Previous Week6657
- Total Articles743
- New Articles This Week0
Latest Articles
- Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race?
- Racial Disparities in Wiretap Applications Before Federal Judges
- Domestic Workers and A Legacy of Legislative Exclusion
- The Statute Whose Name We Dare Not Speak: Emtala and the Affordable Care Act
- Motherhood Preconceived: The Emergence of the Preconception Health and Health Care Initiative
- Subjective and Objective Indicators of Racial Progress
- The Return of Biological Race? Regulating Innovations in Race and Genetics Through Administrative Agency Race Impact Assessments
- A Short History of Immigrant Rights in the United States
- Black Greek-letter Organizations : Belief, Truth, and Positive Organizational Deviance
- “Unemployed (And Black) Need Not Apply”
- Black Marriage, White People, Red Herrings
- The End of Reparations Talk: Reparations in an Obama World
- Did I Do That? An Argument for Requiring Pennsylvania to Evaluate the Racial Impact of Medicaid Policy Decisions Prior to Implementation
- Striving for Equality, but Settling for the Status Quo in Health Care: Is Title VI More Illusory than Real?
- Tragedy and Remedy: Reparations for Disparities in Black Health
- Is Massachusetts Health Insurance Reform Legislation: An Effective Tool for Addressing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care?
- To Check or Not to Check: New EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Use of Criminal History Information in Making Hiring Decisions
- Lean In and One Percent Feminism
- A Patient's Right to Choose Is Not Always Black and White: Long Term Care Facility Discrimination and the Color of Care
- Principles to Guide Society's Response to Incarcerated Offenders with a Mental Disorder
- Arrests of and Forced Interventions on Pregnant Women in the United States, 1973-2005: Implications for Women's Legal Status and Public Health
- What Happens to the Women Who Fall Through the Cracks of Health Care Reform? Lessons from Massachusetts
- The Right Choice for Elections: How Choice Voting Will End Gerrymandering and Expand Minority Voting Rights, from City Councils to Congress
- It's [Not] a Black Thing: the Black/gay Split over Same-sex Marriage--a Critical [Race] Perspective
- Indian Tribes: Evolving into Nationhood
- “[This] I Know from My Grandfather:” The Battle for Admissibility of Indigenous Oral History as Proof of Tribal Land Claims
- The Assimilation of Native Juveniles via Federal Policies on Education, Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice
- Hit it and Quit It”: Responses to Black Girls' Victimization in School
- Public Health Preparedness and the Law in Communities of Color
- Why Empirically Destabilizing the “Race” Ipsa Loquitur Trope Matters: Reorienting Equal Protection Around Social Practices
