The Overall Exclusion Rate

 

The first step in determining an exclusion grade is to calculate the number of exclusions. Exclusions are the number of expulsions plus out-of-school suspensions plus Emergency Removal by District Personnel plus Removal by Hearing officer. For many districts, this is more of an approximation than an actual number.  Many districts, instead of reporting the exact number of discipline occurrences and enrollment numbers, reported: "< 10".  We took that to mean "less than 10" disciplinary occurrences in the particular category.   To calculate a rate, we arbitrarily assigned a value of "3" for all districts that reported "less than 10".

Of the 879 reporting districts, the half had more than 94 exclusions, with the average being 348 total exclusions. Some districts had 0 exclusions; while one district had 23,988 exclusions.  The total number of exclusions for the state of Ohio was 242,388. That is in Ohio, during 2017-2018, over 240,000 expulsions, out-of-school suspensions and removals occurred.


To compare districts, a rate was calculated by diving the total number of exclusions by total adjusted enrollment, multiplied by 100 and rounding to 1 decimal point.

There were a total of 879 districts reporting discipline occurrences data. Of the 1173 districts, only Community (Chart) Schools and Public school districts reported discipline occurrences. Half the reporting schools had rates equal to or below 7.3 exclusions per 100 students. [4]

While the average was 17.7 exclusions per 100 students; the lowest reported was 0 exclusions per 100 students, and the highest was 188.6 exclusions per 100 students. That is 188.6 combined expulsion, out-of-school suspension, and removals per 100 students. 

 

Total Exclusions Rate 

 

Number of Districts

Mean

Median

Minimum

Maximum

 

879

17.7

7.3

0.0

188.6

 

Community (Charter) Districts had an average (38.4 exclusions per 100 students) that was 4.5 times that of Public districts (8.5 exclusions per 100 students. This difference in organizational type was statistically significant (p=.000).

 

Total Exclusions Rate 
by  Organization Type

Organization Type

Number of Districts

% of Total Number of District

Mean

Median

Minimum

Maximum

Community (Charter) School

273

31.1%

38.4

29.7

0.2

188.6

Public District

606

68.9%

8.5

5.5

0.0

95.7

 ANOVA

   

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

   

168440.949

1

168440.949

396.258

0.000

   

  


Urban districts had an average (38.2 exclusions per 100 students) that was 11.6 times that of Suburban Public Districts w (3.3 exclusions per 100 students). This difference was statistically significant (p=.000). 

 

Total Exclusions Rate
by Typology of Public Districts

Typology of Public Districts

Number of Districts

% of Total Number of Districts

Mean

Median

Minimum

Maximum

Type 1: Rural - High Student Poverty & Small Student Population

123

20.3%

6.7

5.6

0.3

36.1

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

105

17.4%

5.3

3.8

0.0

22.1

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

110

18.2%

4.9

4.5

0.5

16.0

Type 4:  Small Town - High Student Poverty & Average Student Population Size

89

14.7%

9.7

7.1

0.2

33.3

Type 5: Suburban - Low Student Poverty & Average Student Population Size

77

12.7%

8.2

6.4

0.5

31.7

Type 6:  Suburban - Very Low Student Poverty & Large Student Population

46

7.6%

3.3

2.7

0.2

13.3

Type 7:  Urban - High Student Poverty & Average Student Population

47

7.8%

26.8

23.2

0.7

95.7

Type 8: Urban - Very High Student Poverty & Very Large Student Population

8

1.3%

38.2

39.6

22.3

48.0

     

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

   

27119.367

7

3874.195

80.422

0.000

   

 

 

Best Districts Based on Exclusion Rates

 

Three districts had a rate of zero exclusions per 100 students (Ottoville Local, Pettisville Local, Russia Local). While the following 41 schools and districts had a rate of  less than one exclusion per 100 students: 

District Name

Organization Type

Typology of Public Districts

A+ Arts Academy

Community (Charter) School

 

Anna Local

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Antwerp Local

Public District

Type 1: Rural - High Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Canfield Local

Public District

Type 5: Suburban - Low Student Poverty & Average Student Population Size

Canton Harbor High School

Community (Charter) School

 

Chesapeake Union Exempted Village

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Columbus Bilingual Academy-North

Community (Charter) School

 

Constellation Schools: Westpark Community Elementary

Community (Charter) School

 

Dawson-Bryant Local

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

East Holmes Local

Public District

Type 1: Rural - High Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Edon Northwest Local

Public District

Type 1: Rural - High Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Fairbanks Local

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Fairland Local

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Federal Hocking Local

Public District

Type 1: Rural - High Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Fort Loramie Local

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Genoa Area Local

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Granville Exempted Village

Public District

Type 6:  Suburban - Very Low Student Poverty & Large Student Population

Ironton City

Public District

Type 4:  Small Town - High Student Poverty & Average Student Population Size

Jackson-Milton Local

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Jennings Local

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Joseph Badger Local

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Marion Local

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Minster Local

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

New Bremen Local

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Newark Digital Academy

Community (Charter) School

 

Northeastern Local

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

Oakwood City

Public District

Type 6:  Suburban - Very Low Student Poverty & Large Student Population

Old Brook High School

Community (Charter) School

 

Ottawa Hills Local

Public District

Type 6:  Suburban - Very Low Student Poverty & Large Student Population

Pandora-Gilboa Local

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Parkway Local

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Perrysburg Exempted Village

Public District

Type 6:  Suburban - Very Low Student Poverty & Large Student Population

Revere Local

Public District

Type 6:  Suburban - Very Low Student Poverty & Large Student Population

Shadyside Local

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

St Clairsville-Richland City

Public District

Type 3: Small Town - Low Student Poverty & Small Student Population

St Henry Consolidated Local

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Steubenville City

Public District

Type 7:  Urban - High Student Poverty & Average Student Population

Versailles Exempted Village

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Wauseon Exempted Village

Public District

Type 4:  Small Town - High Student Poverty & Average Student Population Size

Waynesfield-Goshen Local

Public District

Type 2: Rural - Average Student Poverty & Very Small Student Population

Wellsville Local

Public District

Type 4:  Small Town - High Student Poverty & Average Student Population Size

Wilmington City

Public District

Type 4:  Small Town - High Student Poverty & Average Student Population Size